(2006) ‘Truth’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2006 Edition), Edward N. Hartmann (eds), (2005), special issue, ‘Coherence, Truth and Testimony’, Erkenntnis, 63/3. (1918) ‘Thoughts’, in Frege, Logical Investigations, ed. (1976) ‘What is a Theory of Meaning (II)’, in G. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).ĭummett, M. (1990) ‘The Structure and Content of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy, 87/6, 279–328.ĭevitt, M. Lepore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Essays on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson. (1986) ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge’, in E. (1974) ‘In Defense of the Coherence Theory of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy, 71/21, 791–811.ĭavidson, D. (1994) ‘Spinoza on Truth’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72/1, 1–16.ĭauer, F.W. (1978) ‘The Coherence Theory of Truth’, Philosophical Studies, 34/3, 351–60.Ĭurley, E. (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company), 119–27.Ĭohen, L.J. Sellars (eds), Readings in Philosophical Analysis. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.).Ĭarnap, R. (Frankfurt-Heusenstamm: ontos verlag), 13–23.Ĭarnap, R. Wang (eds), Language and World, Part Two: Signs, Minds and Actions. Damnjanovic (2010) ‘The Coherence Theory of Truth: Russell’s Worst Invention?’, in V. (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Ĭandlish, S. (2007) The Russell/Bradley Dispute and Its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy. (1909) ‘On Truth and Coherence’, Mind, 18/329, reprinted in his Essays on Truth and Reality. (London: Oxford University Press).īradley, F.H. (1911) Logic or the Morphology of Knowledge. (London: George Allen and Unwin).īosanquet, B. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.īlanshard, B. (1994) The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. (1952) ‘Truth’, in The Concept of a Person and Other Essays. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Īyer, A.J. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īlcoff, L. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. And again, pragmatists hold that the truth of a proposition is a matter of its being useful to believe. On the other hand, coherence theorists hold that the truth of a proposition is a matter of its relations to other propositions. For example, on the one hand, correspondence theorists hold that the truth of a proposition is a matter of the proposition’s standing in a relation to something else which is not a proposition, such as a fact. Amongst the inflationary theories, there are other fundamental divisions. According to this map, the most foundational divide amongst theories of truth is that between deflationary and inflationary theories, where, roughly, the former hold that truth is an insubstantial, logical property of little philosophical interest and the latter that it is a substantial property suitable for philosophical attention. Why do pure coherence theories fail? What does Walker proposal to consider impure coherence theories consist in?ġ5.Although its use is not universal, there is a map of the logical space of theories of truth that is widely applied. Are the correspondence theory and the coherence theory of truth incompatible with deflationism?ġ4. In which sense are the correspondence theory and the coherence theory of truth incompatible?ġ3. What does idealism consist in? Are coherentists committed to it? Are idealists committed to coherentism?ġ2. What does anti-realism consist in? Is anti-realism committed to a coherence account of truth? Are coherentists committed to anti-realism?ġ1. Is true in that world that dogs have two legs? Assuming the coherence theory of truth is the correct one in every world, is it true that if there were no beliefs there would be no truth at all?ġ0. Assume the correspondence theory of truth is right, and let Birdland be a country in which "dogs" means "birds". How satisfactory are these answers in philosophical terms?ĩ. State the seven objections against coherentism Walker considers, along with his answers. What’s Walker’s designated set of believes other beliefs must cohere with to be true?Ĩ. What’s Russell’s main objection to coherentism? How does Walker reply to this objection?Ħ. What does the coherence theory consist in?ĥ. What does the correspondence theory consist in?Ĥ. What’s the difference between a theory about the nature of truth, a criterion for truth, the concept of truth, and the meaning of the truth predicate? In which of these categories do correspondentism, coherentism, and deflationism fall?ģ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |